Ports Of Call Forum Index Impressum / Contact // data privacy / Datenschutz
 

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Stickymonk Ships
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 23, 24, 25
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ports Of Call Forum Index -> XXL User Made Ports, Goods, Vessels
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Thomk
PoC Regular
Unlicensed
PoC Regular<br>Unlicensed


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Looks better now mate but its a bit to large for shipview i changed it to res 430.

org res 500:




new res 430:



Great work btw

I gues you could also use res 450 to make it work.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thomk
PoC Regular
Unlicensed
PoC Regular<br>Unlicensed


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Thu Oct 31, 2013 2:38 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Btw you can merge my .xml file form my Triple e beta. Your data looks bad...no reefers teu?

I used datas from fleetmon they are originals from ABS Classification Society, just take out what you need:


Quote:
<ship>
<index>000</index>
<kategorie_typ>CARGO</kategorie_typ>
<sub_typ>CONTAINER</sub_typ>
<schiffsname>Maersk Mc-Kinney Moller</schiffsname>
<baujahr>2002</baujahr>
<sondergueter_code>0</sondergueter_code>
<statusreq>75</statusreq>
<delivertime>90</delivertime>
<flat_cont_TEU>-</flat_cont_TEU>
<TEU>18270</TEU>
<kuehlschiff_TEU>1800</kuehlschiff_TEU>
<laenge>399</laenge>
<breite>59</breite>
<sbreite>59</sbreite>
<tiefgang>15.5</tiefgang>
<maxhoehe>30,3</maxhoehe>
<brt>194849</brt>
<dwt>194153</dwt>
<nrt>79120</nrt>
<anzahl_passagiere>8</anzahl_passagiere>
<firstclass>0</firstclass>
<crew>22</crew>
<betriebskosten>8760</betriebskosten>
<max_geschw>25.0</max_geschw>
<kw>59360</kw>
<treibstoffverbrauch>139.74</treibstoffverbrauch>
<bunkerkap>19630.3</bunkerkap>
<preis_max>133000</preis_max>
<bugstrahl>1</bugstrahl>
<heckstrahl>0</heckstrahl>
<traegheit>16</traegheit>
<korrosionsfak>0.4</korrosionsfak>
<umschlagzeit>1</umschlagzeit>
<sonderschiff_frachtart>-</sonderschiff_frachtart>
<moegliche_optionen>0</moegliche_optionen>
<bildinforeferenz>MAERSK_MCKINNEY_MOLLER</bildinforeferenz>
<sonderinfos>0</sonderinfos>
<flagge>Denmark</flagge>
<werft>DAEWOO SHIPBUILDING & MARINE ENGINEERING CO., LTD.</werft>
<flags>-</flags>
<cars>-</cars>
<trailers>-</trailers>
<maxshipavailable>10</maxshipavailable>
<rentingcostperday>0</rentingcostperday>
<stretchcostperbed>0</stretchcostperbed>
<smallwater>0</smallwater>
<harbourships>0</harbourships>
<waterline>62</waterline>
<sndfile>cont01</sndfile>
<sndscale>1.5</sndscale>
<sndoffset>8</sndoffset>
<levelcmatton>0</levelcmatton>
</ship>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thomk
PoC Regular
Unlicensed
PoC Regular<br>Unlicensed


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 6:54 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Okay i found some other Problems, the one that we allready now, because of the wrong tonnage details the ship is totally overloaded with light cargo of textiles:




An other problem which i also have with CSCL Star, CSCL Venus and Mary Maersk is that the ship dont uses Suez canal, the same with your Majestic Maersk:



Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thomk
PoC Regular
Unlicensed
PoC Regular<br>Unlicensed


Joined: 20 Oct 2013
Posts: 44

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 7:14 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

okay i found the problem with Suez, its the beam, as soon as the beam is 51,0 or higher the ships dont use Suez anymore...strange. On vessel spec. page its only writen that they cant use panama canel. I though "sbeam" in .xml file is for cheating on the beam to make ship use the canels but its not:

Code:
<breite>50</breite>
<sbreite>51</sbreite>
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
rdklein
PoC Veteran
Admin
PoC Veteran<br>Admin


Joined: 06 Aug 2002
Posts: 5253
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Fri Nov 01, 2013 12:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Suez Channel also had a maximum width for ships - maybe if it changed we have to introduce a time based feature.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Ports Of Call Forum Index -> XXL User Made Ports, Goods, Vessels All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 23, 24, 25
Page 25 of 25

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group